Can Astrological Predictions About Indian Politics be Made?
Can Astrological Predictions About Indian Politics be Made?
The political future of India is being hotly debated in the current pre-election scenario with questions like “who will form the next government?” and “who will be the next prime minister of India?” being uppermost in everyone’s mind.
The question bothering me, however, is that “Is it really possible to answer such questions based on astrology for a country blessed with political volatility like that of India?” There are at least ten prospective prime ministerial candidates for the upcoming general elections, of which there are a few like Dr. Manmohan Singh, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi who nurture an unexpressed desire for the position. Some of the other possible contenders for the position include Sh. L.K. Advani, Sh. Narendra Modi, Smt. Mayawati, Sh. Sharad Pawar, Sh. Deve Gowda, Sh. Lalu Prasad Yadav, Sh. Ram Vilas Paswan.
Taking up the first question, “who will form the next government of India?,” one can easily see how national and regional parties have been busy promoting themselves. Even the common man can make out which of the two prominent national parties might enjoy a greater share of seats and which one lesser. He can also make an assessment of which regional parties might provide support to the national parties and the general political scenario at the time of elections.
When we consider the possibility of making such predictions on the basis of astrology, however, problems of a completely different nature arise. As, for instance, the date and time when the party was formally constituted are some of the essential requirements to make any kind of astrological predictions, which are not easily available most of the time. Now the question is, then how can astrological answers be sought about which parties would come together and who will form the next government.
Are birth details including the date, time and place of birth available for all the politicians? And if not, then how can astrological predictions be made about them with any level of certainty?
As part of the research and analysis conducted by “Astrological Research Centre” in the field of politics, we observed that people have already started making detailed astrological analysis and assessments regarding the next government at the centre when no one could predict before or even after 2004 general elections, that Dr. Manmohan Singh will become the prime minister of India. In the same manner, how would it be possible to make correct predictions this time around?
At Astrological Research Centre, we believe that it is only based on a methodical study of the horoscopes of all the main candidates contesting the election from every constituency that the strength of astrological Rajayogas can be assessed for all of them. Then the person with the strongest Rajayoga operating can be predicted to win the elections.
Likewise, a detailed study of the horoscopes of all the prominent politicians can reveal which of them have the most powerful Rajayogas. Such politicians alone can be the promising candidates for occupying an exalted position.
After 1992 elections, our institute sought the birth details of some politicians for research purposes, and to our surprise, the details received for the then prime minister Sh. P.V. Narsimha Rao mentioned the date of birth as 28 th June, 1921, time is between 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. and place of birth is Karim Nagar, Andhra Pradesh (the letter received from PMO is available for reference). Now, one can see that a period of one hour between 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. has been mentioned as the time of birth. Does an hour’s variation really not matter in making Indian astrological calculations?
Despite this drawback, we tried to establish the time of birth based on past events in his life and made a few predictions as well. We also asked for details of Sh. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, leader of the opposition as a prominent leader of the BJP in 1994. The letter received was signed by Sh. Vajpayee himself and mentioned hat he was born on 25 th December, 1926 in Gwalior at about 5:00 p.m. The time of birth was approximate and not based on a clock.
In both of the abovementioned cases, when politicians themselves are in doubt of their birth details, it would be sheer dishonesty to even imagine being able to come up with accurate predictions and any results can only be predicted in terms of approximations.
Similarly, without a proper knowledge of the birth details of small-time as well as prominent politicians of the day, and without information of the time when different political parties were constituted, how is it possible to make reliable predictions on Indian politics?
In recently held presidential elections in America, Mr. Barack Obama and Mrs. Hillary Clinton fought for the coveted position. In USA, people elect their president directly from two chosen candidates, and one with the strongest Rajayoga emerges as the winner. In this case, Hillary Clinton also became a part of Obama’s cabinet, but did not become the president, which could mean that although she also had a Rajyoga but not as strong as Obama himself.
Similar examples can be found across the globe, especially in places with scarce regional and small-time parties unlike India. Political organizations of all shapes and sizes come together in order to help form the government in India, which, from an astrological viewpoint, is further complicated by an unending confusion in birth details of most of the politicians, leading us to the inevitable conclusion that, if not impossible, it is extremely difficult to make authentic political predictions in a country with a political framework like that of India.
Taking up another example, in the last cricket world cup, a horde of astrologers, numerologists and tarot readers created media hype with predictions of India entering the semi-finals when the team was ousted in the first round itself. Likewise, before one of the matches, some tarot readers predicted that Sehwag will shine today but soon he was out for a duck. It could well mean that the tarot reader made an assessment about Sehwag but perhaps did not study the fortunes of the bowler who claimed his wicket.
In the same manner, in order to make authentic predictions regarding the political future of India, we may have to study the horoscopes of all the candidates contesting the elections from different part of the country to decide upon who will win the elections and what would be the actual political configuration between different political parties of the state. Otherwise, an astrologer would be able to guess just as much as the common man.
It is a matter of serious debate and research in Indian astrology that “who will form the next government and who will be the next prime minister of India?” Else astrology and astrologers would only become a laughing stock for the world.
by Pt. Sunil Sharma
Director
Astrological Research Centre
Pt. Sunil Sharma was serving as assistant director from 1990 till 2002 and as director of Astrological Research Centre since then which was established in 1952 by late Pt. Raja Ram Shastri. This organization has made outstanding contributions in the field of research and personal predictions. A postgraduate in Political Science and Sanskrit, he has been involved in original research work on astrology for past 15 years. He also launched the website (http://www.astrocent.com) of this august institution on 24th December, 2004 which makes accessible to all original research work, criticism and a host of other concepts associated with astrology in the form of research and criticism articles which are nowhere else to be found on the world wide web. Another special feature of this website is manual horoscope which is a completely novel concept on the web. He does not believes in computerized astrological predictions as well as calculations and has also given the reasons in his research articles on the website.
<
People all over the world and here in the US believe that Americans are divided by party lines. The name of the game in Washington is usually Democrats vs. Republicans; however, a new poll came out that reveals that 43% of voters identify themselves as independents. So what could this mean for the two political parties, and if Americans are choosing not to side with either one, what effect could this have on the American political system? RT’s Dina Gusovsky speaks to Brent Budowsky, columnist for The Hill newspaper.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Tags: About, Astrological, Indian, Made, politics, Predictions
i want to mount Dina
Reagan and the Bushs cut taxes [on the wealthy],
both increased the size of government and
are responsible for the majority of the Debt and subsequent yearly interest.
So they are socialist commies – [more dangerous than Hitler and Russia]
per wrong-wing definers !
Need to re-examine how and why they got away with it !
@hackit12 – ‘Cash for Clunkers’
Using MY money (extracted by force at the point of a gun) to pay SOMEONE else to destroy a car so that SOMEBODY else can have an excuse to build a new car (consuming FAR more energy than could ever be saved through the improved fuel efficiency) for SOMEBODY else to drive using ethanol produced from corn diverted (by Federal regulations) from a food supply that could be feeding starving people. Welcome to centralized planning.
Historic DEBT – Republicans Reagan/Bushs
Historic cloture and filibusters – by Republicans in Congress.
Historic delays in blocking cabinet appointments – by Republicans in Congress.
-
Tea Party Corporatists – Ron/Rand Paul
… Oppose Civil Rights Act … ignore morality and civility of it.
– defend Wall St. crooks – defends BP – immunity for corporations !
-
Advantage Democrats … !
spacehabitats -’Less individual freedom’-
-
Tax cut for over 98% of wage earners,
student aid, ending credit card fraud, funding SCHIP, equal pay for women, economic recovery, helping 170,000 keep their homes, stem cell research, increase to Veterans Affairs budget, Cash for Clunkers – 680,000 inefficient vehicles replaced, Tariffs on Steel and Tires from China, American Clean Energy and Security Act, Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), HealthCare for ALL !
4hsbs -’this country is not a Democratic’-
-
James Madison defined republic in terms of _”representative democracy”_ as opposed to direct democracy, and this usage is “still employed …”
The “Father of the Constitution,” he was _’the principal author of the document’_. In 1788, he wrote over a third of _’the Federalist Papers’_, still the most influential commentary on the Constitution.
American ..cough.. totalitarism ..cough.. dictatorship ..cough.. terrorists
this country is not a Democratic it’s a republic > when was the last time that he placed his allegiance to the flag >the republic for witch it stands
@TheFreedomWatch Yeah that’s what I was thinking…left and right and parties are just distractions. Although its nice to see that the people who want minimal government are being heard, but labeling it with a party name just makes it part of the game when there are bigger issues to worry about,
Barack Obama never intended to change the SYSTEM. He wanted to perpetuate the trends that every administration (Republican AND Democrat) have pushed for the last fifty years: More debt. Less individual freedom. Disappearing middle class. Centralization of power. Eroding U.S. sovereignty.
These aren’t problems he inherited. These are goals he and every other political insider has been working to attain.
That is entirely untrue.
Germany was completely faltering on the eastern front.
If the US hadn’t entered the war, the war would have simply gone on for afew more years. But Russia would have still beaten Germany.
Granted, Russia’s casualties would have been significantly higher and their military and economic position post-war would have been severely diminished.
@GoldenZealot21
“Less then that”. Quite scientific. You win again! LOL.
Less than that, but what is to be expected when you take on the entire offensive forces and just about all the defensive forces about the European Axis? If all that Axis power was in France, there wouldn’t be a US military to speak of XD! The US was nothing in power compared to Germany, unless you consider a small infantry garrison in France. But 90% of Axis forces and 95+% of tanks, planes, etc? That’s what the Soviets took on, and WON BITCH XD!!
@GoldenZealot21
13,600,000 Soviet military dead. You win!
Truth hurts man. If the Western Allies were decently useful in fighting the Germans, they would have landed in 1942 at the latest, not when the Soviets were on a non-stop ride straight to Berlin.
@GoldenZealot21 LOL, that is great.
As an Independent we are tired of the lies from the two majority parties. We are tired of watching this country crumble due to the two majority parties not agreeing on moral issues due to the hardhead bullshit/they refuse to budge because my buddy doesnt agree with me way of thinking. . Bush used 9/11 to fight a war in Iraq. Iran,Pakistan,
Saudi Arabia is where Terrorist were. Common sense people know that. Common sense people also know
Obama made ridiculous promises that couldnt be kept!
Lol Golden you aren’t that smart.
The USA fought on 2 fronts Europe and Assia. Which Russia barely did. Also it should be noted that the USA was the ones that provided the supplies in europe, and how Russia’s strategy to beat the German’s was to destroy their own supplies and kill themselves off. As well as the fact that Russia had more casualties in the war then every other nation combined.
Oh yes you soviets sure showed the world how strong you are in WW2
Rofl
I know right? Like when the US just landed in France, the Soviets were in Poland and the Balkans, taking their time pushing through the entire European Axis offensive and homeland defensive forces and effectively finishing off the Germans. Talk about late arrival on USA’s part haha.
If the U.S. didn’t step in Russia would have fallen.
I think you are a retarded American then because I am an independent not a fascist. You are about as intelligent as the hand you jerk your dick off with. I say we should of let Patton fuck Russia up and there would be no problem in Moscow while being a puppet of our country. I never liked Russia or the history of Russia. Take your RussiaToday news and shove it up your Stalin filled asses.
Hey retard, fascist scum. I am American, and a lot more intelligent than you
fuck off, bitch.
First off you commie scum we could of sent patton and the 3rd Army into your country and right now your Russian country would be flying your flag under ours. So why don’t you and you Russians push the button or maybe the people who have already used a nuke once should show you who has the balls.We would commit suicide before we ever let you take power of the world.Either the world dies or we keep our freedom.This is founded in the words give me liberty or give me death.You got stalin tough luck.
Long Live the independents who hate the corrupt government and love America.
Does anyone else realize Dina’s surname is in the Masculine form? )